Mr. President, as we commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Selma to Montgomery Voting Rights March this month, I rise to honor the work and sacrifice of Jonathan Myrick Daniels. He was a young Episcopalian seminary student from Keene, New Hampshire, who answered Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.’s call for clergy to travel to Alabama to join him on this march.
Jonathan lost his life five months later, in an act that Reverend King called “one of the most heroic Christian deeds of which I have heard in my entire ministry.”
Although Jonathan had originally intended to spend a short time in the south and then return to his studies at the Episcopal Theological School in Boston, he felt compelled by events to remain in Alabama through the spring and summer to register voters with the Episcopalian Society for Cultural and Racial Unity.
On August 14, 1965, Jonathan was arrested along with a number of other civil rights activists at a demonstration in Fort Deposit, Alabama - a small town outside of Montgomery. They had gone there to protest segregation in the town’s stores. But their demonstration was over within minutes. Armed white men from the town descended on them and took them to jail.
Jonathan and his fellow activists spent six days in the Hayneville County jail. Many in the group were still teenagers.
Despite the conditions, Jonathan somehow maintained an unflaggingly upbeat attitude and good humor. He wrote his mother in New Hampshire a brief letter from jail, apologetically describing it as a “peculiar birthday card” for her. He wrote: “The food is vile and we aren’t allowed to bathe (whew!)…As you can imagine, I’ll have a tale or two to swap over our next martini.”
He declined an offer of bail money from an Episcopal organization, because the amount would not have covered the release of the rest of his group.
On Friday, August 20, the whole group was suddenly released. Strangely, their bail had been waived, and no one was there to meet them or take them home. The town seemed completely deserted.
Jonathan and a few others walked a block away to a store to buy something to eat and drink. As he climbed the steps of the porch to the store, he suddenly heard someone shout from inside and threaten to shoot if they didn’t leave. Jonathan barely had time to react before the man opened fire, but somehow he managed to jump in front of his friend Ruby Sales, a seventeen year old African-American girl.
He saved Ruby’s life, but Jonathan was killed by the close range shot that was intended for her. He was just 26 years old.
The shooter called the murder in to the sheriff’s office himself. He said, “I just shot two preachers. You better get on down here.” An all-white jury later acquitted the man, taking just two hours to find him not guilty.
While Jonathan was sacrificing his life for civil rights in Alabama, here in the U.S. Senate debate raged over the federal government’s role in protecting the voting rights of disfranchised American citizens.
Since 1870, the 15th Amendment to the Constitution had prohibited state governments from denying a citizen’s right to vote based on race. However, in precincts throughout the South, black Americans were subjected to discriminatory poll taxes, literacy tests and other forms of voter intimidation.
In many places, town clerks outright refused to register black voters.
Just two weeks before Jonathan was killed, Congress finally passed the Voting Rights Act, which outlawed electoral practices that discriminated against minority groups.
2015 marks the 50th anniversary of this landmark law. And while this anniversary presents an obvious time for reflection, it is also a time to look forward and address the challenges still facing our country.
The impact of the Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down a critical section of the law requiring federal approval for electoral law changes in districts with a history of discrimination, is particularly troubling.
This ruling now allows states to implement restrictive voting requirements that will make it more difficult for voters to cast their ballots. In fact, since this ruling almost all of the affected states have already begun attempts to restrict voting, targeting seniors, students and minorities and threatening their access to the polls.
The right to make your voice heard as a citizen of this nation is a fundamental principle of our great democracy and should never be infringed upon. We have a responsibility to protect this right and address these injustices.
While our nation has made a lot of progress since the 1960s and ‘70s, the struggle is far from over. Inequality and racism remain in our society. And, as long as discrimination and racial disparities exist, the full protections of the Voting Rights Act are necessary to guarantee the rights of citizenship for every American.
Jonathan Daniels should be turning 76 years old in March. He is widely recognized as a martyr of the 20th century. In Keene, his hometown, an elementary school bears his name.
As we mark the 50th anniversary of his passing, as well as of the passage of the Voting Rights Act, we must strive to honor his legacy by ensuring that all current and future American citizens can exercise the rights he died to protect.
Senator Shaheen honored Keene civil rights martyr Jonathan Daniels in a speech before the Senate yesterday:
0 Comments
Senator Shaheen floated lightly to the well of the Senate late last week and delivered the following remarks while floating one inch above the carpet: Madam President, I’ve come to the floor today to reiterate my opposition to legislation that would impose new tax burdens on businesses in New Hampshire and have a serious impact on our economy. I have a love/hate relationship with the conservative blog Granite Grok. The love is for the great public service their bloggers do shooting video of conservative speeches and short interviews of activists and then posting them online. Just listening to someone is tremendously more revealing in a thousand subtle ways than reading a second hand summation of what they said. When I started this blog I intended to pass along a great deal more of these interviews, but my ambition to transcribe them into text has been slowing that down. I'm very verbally oriented, and I get aggravated spending the time actually watching video of someone when I could read a transcript in a quarter of the time. But transcription is just a time investment I can't make right now, so I'm going to start posting links to video. I highly recommend watching them. Below are the brief remarks of Republican gubernatorial candidates Walter Havenstein and Andrew Hemingway at the state GOP convention a couple months ago. Senator Ayotte and fellow Republican Senator Fischer took to the pages of the Wall Street Journal to discuss the Hobby Lobby controversy. The entire editorial is unfortunately paywalled, but the state GOP has passed along an exerpt: In the days since the Supreme Court's June 30 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby decision, we have been troubled by those who seem eager to misrepresent both the facts of the case and the impact of its ruling on women-all to divide Americans and score political points in a tough election year. When the Democratic bill meant to overturn the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby decision failed to overcome minority opposition in the Senate Jeanne Shaheen released this statement: U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) released the following statement after the U.S. Senate failed to advance the Protect Women’s Health from Corporate Interference Act, also known as the “Not My Boss’ Business Act,” which would have protected women’s health care from employer interference: Her speech before the Senate advocating the bill can be seen here.
My grandfather, a decorated World War II veteran, recently passed away at age 98. He worked two jobs, provided for six kids, and he never used credit cards. The men and women of the "Greatest Generation" understood that you need to live within your means. They also worked hard to leave the country better off than they found it. Senator Shaheen wrote the following opinion piece for the Concord Monitor in reaction to the Hobby Lobby ruling. Too many women across New Hampshire are facing a new threat to their health care: Their employers can now deny coverage for birth control. Republican gubernatorial candidate Walter Havenstein penned the following editorial last week: As New Englanders, we have always enjoyed a friendly rivalry with our neighbors, from sports games to college rankings, from who has the best maple syrup to whose ski slopes produce the best winter athletes. But one area where Granite Staters think we always lead the pack is the economy. Gov. Steve Merrill once described New Hampshire as an island of prosperity in a sea of high taxes. We all like to think he’s right. Republican gubernatorial candidate Andrew Hemingway wrote the following editorial earlier this month: A SUPER-SIZED Las Vegas style casino. An increase in the gas tax. A growth of Obamacare through Medicaid Expansion. The attempt by this administration to find quick fix solutions to our state budgetary problems go on and on, but the reality is that not one of these will actually fix either our budget or New Hampshire’s real economic issues in the long term. Matt Murray of NH Labor News recently attended the NH Progressive Summit and went to a workshop on writing speeches with a Progressive Economic Narrative. The fruit of his efforts: Today I want to talk to you about how we build an America and a New Hampshire that works for all of us, not just the ultra wealthy one-percent (1%). |